Vince Russo – David Arquette winning the title

I like Russo, but one thing I’ll say.  

Recently he’s been repeatedly using the logic that, since people are still talking about David Arquette winning the WCW World Heavyweight Championship, 16 years later, it means it’s a successful booking decision.

If for whatever reason, Stephanie McMahon or Hornswoggle were the ones that ended the Undertaker’s Wrestlemania winning streak (instead of Lesnar), I’m sure in 40 years time people would still be talking about it (in an extremely negative way).  Would Russo consider Stephanie beating the Undertaker at Wrestlemania good booking decision, because people would be talking about it 40 years later?

I’m sure if Judy Bagwell was brought back and beat Dean Ambrose for the WWE championship, I’m sure people would be talking about it in 20 years time (again in a negative sense).  Would that mean it’s a great booking decision?  

Can someone get this through to him??  His admitted before when he’s made a terrible booking decision.  This was his worst.  

He’s constantly is bringing it up in his video’s of late, gloating that it’s a great booking decision.

 

   

Back to top button